27 June 2007

The American Myth About Home Ownership


(click on photo for a bird's eye view)

Be A Man, Buy a House?

I came across an interesting Forbes piece on the Internet this morning. The title of it was "Don't Buy That House".

Among the amusing items I found was this gem from the cheerleading NAR of the time (the 1920s) . . . which makes David Lereah's recent pep rally soundbites seem a bit, well, tame.

Homeownership has been touted as civic responsibility, "moral muscle" and a bulwark against communism. A 1922 pamphlet from the National Association of Real Estate Boards even promised that it would put the "MAN back in MANHOOD." Over the years, it has been claimed that homeowners vote more, join more voluntary associations, take better care of their residences and have better-educated kids.

That one made me laugh out loud.

Back in the 20s, there was no Viagara. But there were cigars and homes to buy to make a man feel more "manly." Whoever was in charge of the NAR at the time didn't use a legendary spinmeister economist such as David Lereah. Instead, he (women had no positions of authority in those days) had a copywriter who knew how to sell without a bunch of numbers involved. And the two of them probably smoked big cigars over every line of copy just to make sure they hit that one emotion which really sells: fear.

Go for the penis instead of the throat. Go for flag waving patriotism in your copy. To buy a home is the American thing to do. To rent is to possibly show your neighbors (and women) that you are a limp dicked Communist.

What bullshit! But it is brilliant copy, it really is. It hammers at the fears of men with low self-esteem with an insight Sigmund Freud must have admired. That copy sold a load of homes in the 20s. (And if you know how the run up in Real Estate during the Housing Bubble of the 1920s added to the good feel of "The Roaring 20s", you would also know that Real Estate crashed in Florida in 1928 . . . one year ahead of the biggest stock market crash of all time.)

While the nascent NAR was urging men to become more American and manly by buying a home . . . they got help from the lenders: the Roaring 20s was the decade where EZ Credit was established. People financed washers, RCA radios, cars and more for the first time.

And here's another fact about American brainwash in the 1920s which was never a myth . . . The Roaring 20s indelibly stamped on frontal lobes of American consumers that one question which still prevails today: "How much is the monthly payment?"

For Roaring 20s homes, a special new product was invented for men with bigger ambitions of Manhood: the Adjustable Rate Mortgage. EZ Credit was the Viagara and Cialisis of the Roaring 20s. So much for having a nation of big swinging dicks owning homes, farms and stocks which they soon lost to foreclosures, bankruptcies and margin calls.

I'm going to give Forbes some props for bringing up the following factoids at the end of their article:

What about all the social benefits attributed to homeownership? It turns out that many of the supposed benefits of ownership are likely due simply to family stability, for which homeownership is an excellent proxy.

For instance, while it is true that the children of homeowners have scored better on standardized tests than the children of renters, there's little to suggest that ownership per se is the cause of better performance.

"Some research has suggested that it isn't whether parents own or rent, but the mobility of the household," says Rachel Drew, a research analyst at Harvard University's Joint Center for Housing Studies. In other words, it's likely that families who stay in one place for a long time (renting or buying) are doing better by their kids than families that move often.

"All of these things we say are benefits of homeownership in the U.S. I think would also be benefits of long-term rental tenancy," says Bourassa.

Certainly there are plenty of stable, wealthy, well-educated places in Europe, at least, where homeownership is far rarer than it is in the U.S. Nearly 70% of all Americans own their own homes; only 34% of the Swiss do. Thriving cities like Hamburg, Amsterdam and Berlin have rates of ownership of just 20%, 16% and 11% respectively, according to the United Nations.

So if something in your gut--or on your bank statement--tells you that now is not the right time to buy, resist the pressure. There may be no place like home, but there's no reason you can't rent it.

I can buy that. A feeling of "rootlessness" is not good for any kid who is bounced from school to school on a regular basis. And which child would grow up with fewer problems: a kid living in an apartment or home rental where the parents are not in debt and are putting away money to further the education of the child? Or a child stuck in the suburbs in a home where ma and pa are now working two jobs to keep the exploding ARM paid and the sheriff from nailing a Foreclosure notice to the door?

Screw the NAR: I'm Comfortable With My Manhood . . . And I Rent

As an adult with no children, I am not locked into staying in just one rental for the sake of my kids either. (Not that I think moving from one rental to another in the same town would be detrimental to children's health as long as they had the same schools and friends to keep.)

And today, renting makes more economical sense than buying a home. Read the whole Forbes article to get a sense of what they are explaining in common sense terms or read my blog where I said the same thing in much lengthier words.

To which I will add: I'd rather save a ton of money by renting. I'd rather take those savings from renting and re-invest them in safe dividend paying stocks, with gold, silver and oil as hedges. And if things ever get tight, I can always find a cheaper rental to live in without destroying my credit.

Furthermore, I will not be renting a house a hundred miles from my workplace.

It may sound un-American, but I'd much rather live in a old Berlin house rental or upper floor Seattle or Prague warehouse apartment rental than live in an American suburb where there is no culture . . . other than that which I can find on my TV . . . and where I struggle to meet the exploding payments on my ARM.

Screw the American Mondo Condo Shopping Mall Hell

Americans put down European living all the time. Usually, these very critics have too often never traveled outside our borders.

I once rented an apartment in downtown Frankfurt, Germany for three years and I cherish those memories of living in early 70s Deutschland. I saw The Who, Led Zepellin, Deep Purple, Pink Floyd, name a great band of the era, just steps from my apartment's door. I owned a Norton 750 Commando Motorcycle which took me to Heidelberg, Munich, Berlin and to countries like Scotland, France, Denmark, etc. I was immersed in culture.

More often than not, I'd buy a monthy "Eurail" pass which allowed me to hop on any train going anywhere. Sometimes, I and a couple of friends would get drunk in a good downtown bar at the beginning of our 3 or 5 day pass, go to the Hauptbahnhof, and simply jump on the first train leaving to see where it would take us. It was magic. Wake up stone sober in say Dusseldorf and run around that city for the day. Or find out you are in Switzerland at the border as your passport is checked.

Forbes mentions Berlin.

I pulled guard duty once in Berlin. That city was the swingingest city in Europe at the time, more so than London or Paris, IMO. And this was a city which was surrounded by Russian troops. Yet the people in West Berlin lived like there was no tomorrow.

The very best symphony I ever heard in my life was in West Berlin, 1971. That's where I heard Dvorak's "From the New World" symphony. To this day, I hold that piece of music as my favorite classical music work because it takes me back to West Berlin.

The Forbes article states that only 11% of my beloved Berlin's current population owns their home. Who cares? Berlin is alive and jumping. Berlin is the city I think of as the new "Capital" of Europe. If I moved there, I would be able to walk or catch a Strassenbahn (electric streetcar) to the incredible art galleries, stores, concert halls, beer halls, coffee shops, and outdoor political rallies and festivals (like Oktoberfest, Fascing (sp?) and the world's biggest Dance Music festival) which make the City fun, young and vibrant. I could spend years just losing myself in lengthy walks of its streets to stop and view inspiring architecture.

On the other hand, one of my visions of hell (I am an atheist, so I am speaking of hell from a contextural view) would be for me to be "stuck" in a $500,000 American suburb or exburb house (which cost me $550,000 a few years ago) and where the closest culture center is the indoor mega-mall.

That mega mall would have maybe one or two outdoor cafes where you could buy a watered down beer and which overlook a 50 acre parking lots. Or maybe you would overlook the nearby Interstate. The closest thing to an art gallery would be the Crafts Connection Poster and Frame Store. My only connection to music would be the salesmen at Sam Ash playing the same metal riff over and over. The only coffee shop would be a Starbucks. And the closest cinema would be the indoor multiplex showing "Diehard 12", "Star Wars 15", "Home Alone 4", and "Scary Movie 7".

When I think of Mega Malls in the burbs, I think of Mojo Nixon's 80s Anthem, "Burn Down the Malls".

America has been so dumbed down that we believe it's a dream to "own" a house miles away from where we work. We are constantly brainwashed to become a good little homeowner miles from nowhere in a development which has no soul.

The NAR's current campaign, "Now is a great time to buy a home," is nothing more than big cigar smoking men . . . and women . . . with vested interests in the Real Estate Cartel patting your head, whispering, "Now be a good little consumer and buy a home." Pat, pat, pat. "Credit is tightening up, but you can use your credit cards for a downpayment." Pat, pat, pat. "And don't pay no never mind to the ARM which kicks in a few years from now. By then rates should be lower, and as you know, home prices always go up." Pat, pat, pat.

The NAR doesn't care a bit about how indebted we might become in our chase of the "American Dream". Their job is to sell homes so they can line their pockets with your hard earned cash. So they lull you to sleepwalk into buying a home which you really cannot afford . . . unless you become their girly man or dumb blonde who never questions their authority.

Note to the NAR flacks: more and more Americans are waking up to the fact of a newer reality - their home owns them.

The more Americans admit their recent home purchase is the biggest mistake of their lives, the more people are adding to the misery index. It's not the naysayers on overpriced housing who are un-American. It's the Real Estate Cartel pushing Liars Loans, overpriced homes, and developments with no longterm planning who are undermining America.

People don't really relish the thought of a one or two hour commute to and from cookie cutter homes. But the NAR doesn't discuss this in thir adverts or billboard ads. People move way the hell out into nowhere because they fear not being able to afford the American Dream which keeps moving further out and farther away.

"Where do you live?"

"Over the mountain pass in that new sub-division which is cheaper than housing near here."

Who wants to live where no one knows your name, where neighbors don't know neighbors . . . unless they are reporting you for breaking Homeowner Association rules such as flying a flag from your lawn, parking a pickup truck in the driveway, or seeing your kids ride bicycles without crash helmets on?

Screw that Home Owners Association Hell

Give me a rental in a garret of an home built in the 1700s in the great city of Berlin which is an accessible, inspiring, cosmopolitan and freethinking vibrant city and society. Or let me find another spacious Key West rental which allows me to almost never need a car as I walk to work and bicycle around town. My neighbors in either locale do not and would not think the less of me for actually, heaven's forbid, renting a place.

Today, we still have Americans biting on "Now is a great time to buy a Home. " But deeply ingrained in that thinking is the American myth that home ownership is a right, that it is a dream to chase at any cost, that it really is a measure of your worth . . . male or female.

Screw Hours of Commuting to and from Work

To the NAR I say you can keep your two to four hours of daily satellite radio listening in your car added to an eight hour day on the job just so you can afford that overpriced, ball and chain, sleep/eat cocoon in the suburbs or exburbs.

No question about it NAR, NHA, and Lenders, you can keep your home in "Misty Meadows - Putting the Magic Back into Homeowning" (as the billboards on the highway describe that place to which you hope to sell me into indentured slavery).

So I sign off with an old adage to members of the Real Estate Cartel: you can fool some of the people some of the time, you can't fool all the people all of the time.

I got my manhood right here. Shake, shake. And my money spent on rent saves cents.

Thankuvurymuch,

DJ Rock has left the building

26 comments:

Anonymous said...

Keep on preaching Rock,

I completely agree with you. Nothing short of prison terrifies me more than the fact that I may be living in suburban hell one day. The kind of location where the only way to tell the houses apart is a house number (meeting size and color specifications, of course). The kind of place where everyone drives the same kind of cars (or car-mix), such as one pickup and SUV, etc. The kind of place where guys spend their weekends keeping the grass green and the women study magazines to find out what is currently chic and trendy and manage to fill the back of the SUV up at Tarzheaea with trinkets and junk to load up the house and make it look presentable. Then, the same people go out mindlessly to the same places and talk about the same stuff (mainly houses).

I see many of my friends stuck in this trap, and I'd as soon rent forever in a small apartment near the bank, bar, park, and work instead of taking the chance of moving to 'dumbville' and driving 2 hours away for the pleasure of doing so.

Larry Kollar said...

Yup, you nailed it. I'm living (and blogging) that particular nightmare myself, not because I wanted to.

Anonymous said...

Nice job,not to much more I could add to that take on the national nightmare.

Anonymous said...

"To rent, is to possibly show your neighbors (and women) that you are a limp dicked Communist."

Good one.

Some may call this piece a rant, but I call it the most honest bit of reporting I've seen all morning.

vanderpooldr said...

"Nearly 70% of all Americans own their own homes; only 34% of the Swiss do."

70% of all americans OWN their homes?? lmao! More like 70% of all americans rent from the bank. What a delusional statement.

Anonymous said...

As a renter of (let's see here...) twenty something years who finally bought a house (in 2000) and sold it (in 2005) because it often felt like a ball and chain around my neck, I feel no shame in being a renter again.

When I realized someone wanted to pay four times for it what I did, they were welcome to it.

Within certain limits (tax breaks, no reduction in savings contributions, being able to take a nice vacation every year, buy at no more than 2x earnings- a short commute, all of which I was able to maintain) it can be a sensible thing to do.

But things like property tax nearly offset your tax deduction, maintenance sucks your savings account in $1500 increments (Ged forbid you buy a "fixer-upper" at these prices) and a lack of mobility (not a problem if you can sell and not be in a deficit position) make it, for this single adult male over 40, a wash.

I will admit over the twenty something years I pined (irrationally so) to own a home, and cursed and kicked because it was often just out of my reach.

But we're always most anxious to have what we cannot.

Lowering the qualification threshold and allowing such easy access to credit might have made home ownership for folks that couldn’t before, but at what cost?

Not only did many over-extend personal finances, but so many others did so on such a HUGE scale that the entire housing market, bond market, and stock market feel it (and not in a good way).

Appreciate your wisdom and perspective because it dovetails nicely with mine. Kudos.

Anonymous said...

ohmygod, LOVE the opening 1920's sales pitch. Eerily apropo.

Anonymous said...

it is a great perspective, i live in georgia, and i don't get it, the average commute around atlanta is the highest in the nation 34 miles. 50 miles, 60 miles, no big deal.

all i can say is they ARE fooling some of the people all of the time, i don't get it myself, but there a heck of a lot of them,

Anonymous said...

Yep, totally agree with you. I went thru hell and high water trying to get into a house and when i finally got one, realized it was overrated. Tax savings? If you actually do the math, it doesn't really save you a whole lot. At least I learned early on and i'm ready to go back to renting in a city with a real life. Suburbia sucks and so do the mortgage payments.

Anonymous said...

You may not like the suburbs, but they are a safe place to raise children and have far better schools.

I work in an office building in an urban downtown. We've had multiple drive by shootings in the neighborhood, culminating in our security guard being shot dead last month.

Would I want to raise children next to where I work just so I could save commute time? No. No I would not.

Anonymous said...

Never thought I would ever see someone with the same last name as me have a blog. Especially a blog on something that interests me.

Anonymous said...

Owning a home is not for everyone, but I think renting is a total waste of money. Nothing creates more wealth than real estate over the long term. I own a summer and a winter home that have substantial equity. I love being able to walk into into my homes and saying this is all mine. I remember when I was young dealing with landlords and throwing my money away on rent. I couldn't wait to own a home.

Sure the market is on the downswing for the next few years, but in 10 or 15 years anyone who owns a home will be all right. It's always been about cash flow. If you can afford the payments through ups and downs in the market, then you'll be fine. It's just like selling all your stocks after a correction. That's when you should be buying.

Anonymous said...

Hmm, I'm kind of in between worlds here. I currently rent in the suburbs, which is either the best or worst of both worlds, depending on how you look at it. I'm selling my house right now, which was about a 45 minute drive from work, my apartment is now 20-30 minutes depending on traffic (I live outside Seattle). A friend of mine experimented with renting in the city for a year, and he just didn't like it. The rent was actually higher than the burbs are, and unlike Europe the cities here were build with the automobile in mind. I was stationed in Germany for 2 years and loved it, best time of my life, but this is not Germany (if it was, I'd totally be living downtown). Here you can move into an overpriced, small apartment, and the only things in walking distance are a nail salon, a sushi bar, and a Starbucks. If you need groceries, you need a car, etc. Where I live it's nice and quiet, there is a Whole Foods just down the street, as well as a major park and lake, and the rent is half what my mortgage and taxes were. I'm not "throwing money away", I tried equity (which is only what someone will actually pay for your house, and that changes greatly) for living where I wanted, paying half as much for it, and being closer to work, family and friends. That works great for me.

Anonymous said...

I read a report that about 1 percent of americans own a home and 2 percent own their vehicle. This sounds about right to me. Owning of course meaning, no mortgage and no loan payments..

I get a kick out of the term, 'trailer trash' and have wondered who created this mindset? Real estate agents perhaps? :)

Not that I'd buy a trailer if I had a choice but anyone with a decent amount of savings can find deals where a mobile home is set up on a piece of land... one or more acres where they have half a chance of paying it off to join us one percent-ers.

Anonymous said...

"Owning" a home has been sold as "the American dream." That's it....it's a dream. Wake up, America. We've been pushed into buying a home so that the mortgage companies make money and so that local governments make money via property taxes.

I recently sold a condo in Florida and now I happily rent a luxury apartment downtown in a northeast city. I am no rush to buy again...in fact, I'm not sure if I'll ever buy again.

The facts:

1) People who "buy" homes do not own them until the mortgage is paid off in full. The term "homeowner" is really a misnomer. "Homeowners" are really no different from renters. The former pays a fixed amount each month in exchange for the right to live in a dwelling. But if the buyer gets two months behind in payments (which could easily happen if one is laid off or gets seriously ill), the bank can kick you out of the house, and you're out of your down payment not to mention all the mortgage payments you made, and your credit is shot. Some advantages: You can paint the walls purple if you wish; you have the use of a yard. Of course, you must also mow that yard and shovel the snow not only in your driveway but on the sidewalk in front of your house lest a pedestrian slip on ice and sue you. Renters never have to worry about these reponsibilities.

2) Renting is not "throwing money away," a term homebuyers love to say and kid themselves about. That's like saying buying groceries is throwing money away. You can spend $100 on groceries that feed your family for a week, but at the end of the week, you have nothing to show for it. Renters pay a fixed amount each month in exchange for place to live. And a rather nice place to live...I have a free 24-hour gym, a helluva view of the city, a concierge to accept my packages, a business center,and top-notch security. If I get a fabulous job offer across the county, I have two options. I can find a sub-lessee or I can pay one or two months' rent to get out of the lease. Simple, no stress.

Many homebuyers faced with the same dilemma end up buying another home and paying two mortgages because they can't sell their old home. Crazy.

The bottom line: It's a personal choice but one is no better than the other. If you're a family of eight, you're probably better off owning. If you're single with no kids (like me) or a couple, why be bogged down with the responsibility of a house? Something always needs to be fixed, utility bills are climbing, and who wants to make a trip to Home Depot every weekend?

And let's face it: Homes MUST be renovated every few years to keep the home marketable. Renovating is expensive not to mention a pain. When I want newer digs, I just move into the newest building in town. Easy.

When I bought my condo in the late 90's, I had time for "homeownership." I worked 35-40 hours a week and my parents were in good health. Now my mother has a terminal illness and I have much more responsibility and stress at work; my workweeks are usually 50-60 hours.

3) When people brag about paying $50,000 for a house in the '70s and selling if for $300,000, making a $250,000 profit, that's b.s. They really paid about $175,000 for the house, including interest, thousands more in property taxes, and a six percent commission to the selling agent. Even taking into account the mortgage deduction,they still barely broke even. Meanwhile, they had all the headaches of homeownership.

I walked away with $150,000 after selling my condo.But that doesn't include the thousands of dollars I paid in attorney fees, the incredible stress I was under when my condo took a year to sell, and the effect on my credit during the months I could't get a tenant and had to pay rent on my new place up north while paying my mortgage.

I realize that was a once in a lifetime financial appreciation. I just happened to buy and sell at the right time. Housing appreciation in the past has only been about 2 percent a year, taking into account inflation. Stocks pay much higher returns. I doubt we will see such high appreciation in real estate in our lifetimes.

As I said, choose what's right for you. But I resent the smugness of homebuyers who think renters are idiots. The richest friend I have (worth about $20 million) sold all his real estate three years ago and now happily rents several places around the country. He enjoys being able to travel on a whim and not worrying about who is getting his mail or who is cutting the grass.

You can't buy that kind of peace of mind.

Anonymous said...

A most excellent bit of prose, my esteemed colleague. And quite true as well...

Anonymous said...

It amazes me that people now feel real estate will never go up again and will be a poor investment forever. Everything moves in cycles, and we happen to be in a down part of the cycle for real estate because after every boom, there is a bust. Things eventually recover, they always do.

The real difference between renting and owning is when you rent you pay your landlord, and he pays his mortgage with your money. He builds equity, you don't. You can rent for years and years and at the end of it you have nothing.

At this stage in the cycle, perhaps renting can make sense, but in the long run, it is better to own than to rent.

Anonymous said...

You all sound like a bunch of whiny "limp-dicked communists" to me.
It must be tough harboring so much bitterness against people who own what you do not. Wait until the housing bubble bursts, and rents skyrocket due to the laws of supply and demand. Then, after you've all been evicted for failure to pay rent, don't come knocking on my door. My home is bought and paid for. You bunch of Gen X'ers (Gen Y'ers?) are nothing more than slacker losers who try to make you and your ilk feel better about about being a bunch of slacker losers with rants attacking what you can't attain. Get a life!

Anonymous said...

"At this stage in the cycle, perhaps renting can make sense, but in the long run, it is better to own than to rent."

yeah in the long run when taxes, insurance and interest don't cost 30% more then just renting.

"Wait until the housing bubble bursts, and rents skyrocket due to the laws of supply and demand. "

Well then I can just buy a house, with all the money I've saved

Anonymous said...

Buying a house makes sense if the total cost per month is roughly equal to rent. Where I live (Houston, Texas), it is cheaper or the same to buy verus rent in some areas when you compare cost per square foot. I'm not talking about $300,000 McMansions (Texas prices), but a decent sized house (1400-1700 sq ft).

If you have a family and rent a two-three bedroom in my area it would cost about $1000-$1400 per month, which is about the same price as a house (including mortgage, interest, tax breaks, HOA fees, property taxes).

Even if you're single, it might make sense to buy depending on how much room you want and then compare costs between buying and renting an apartment. Intended length of stay should also factor in.

If the cost of a home (with taxes, tax breaks, interest,etc.) greatly exceeded renting, I would say scr*w it and rent.

Anonymous said...

Woω, that's what I was looking for, what a material! existing here at this web site, thanks admin of this web page.

Feel free to surf to my web blog - short term loans

Anonymous said...

You arе ѕo interеsting! I do not think I've truly read something like that before. So nice to discover somebody with original thoughts on this subject matter. Seriously.. thank you for starting this up. This web site is something that is needed on the internet, someone with a little originality!

Also visit my web blog ... Instant Payday Loans

Anonymous said...

Greetings from Carolina! I'm bored to death at work so I decided to browse your blog on my iphone during lunch break. I enjoy the knowledge you present here and can't
wait to take a look when I get home. I'm surprised at how fast your blog loaded on my mobile .. I'm not
even using WIFI, just 3G .. Anyhow, amazing blog!


Take a look at my webpage - no freeze cccam

Anonymous said...

hello!,I love your writing so muсh! ρеrсentage we keeр in touch extra about yоur post οn AOL?
I need a specialist іn thіs house tο ѕolve my problem.
Mаybe that is you! Taking a look аhead to peer you.


Look at mу site ... Same Day Payday Loans

Anonymous said...

It's going to be end of mine day, however before ending I am reading this impressive article to increase my know-how.

Also visit my blog - New Bingo Sites

Anonymous said...

Eхcellent wаy of tеlling, and plеaѕant paгagraph to gеt іnformatіοn on the
topiс of mу presentаtion toρic, which і am going to pгеsеnt in uniνersіty.


Here is my homepage - payday loans

Stat Counter from 10 Nov 08