11 June 2007

Miami Dade-Broward's Housing Boom Turns Bust: Will Lower Taxes Ignite Home Sales?


Over the Next 18 Months Miami Will Add 20,000 New Condos
Miami Dade-Broward's inventory of housing for sale has exploded in the past year.
Last month 76,000 "pre-owned" homes were For Sale in that area. Just one year ago, that inventory figure was only 50,000 homes For Sale.
Real Estate observers know that the 20,000 "new" condos which will come online in the next 18 months will not be added to official MLS inventory as new homes and condos are sold by developers, not individual homeowners. Hence, inventory rolls will not automatically rise another 20,000 properties. Still that new hidden inventory will be out there along with all the other new homes which have been on the market for over two years now and which are still not on the inventory rolls.
However, as more foreclosures take place (and foreclosures all over Florida are skyrocketing) and as new owners of some of these condos are forced to walk away from their deposits . . . we can be sure that some of these newer units will add to the glut of already existing homes for sale.
Will Tax Cuts for Housing Get the Market Moving Again?
Florida's state legislature is under pressure by builders, Realtors, lenders . . . in short . . . the whole Housing Bubble Cartel . . . to lower taxes on Real Estate. These vested interests of the cartel believe lower taxes will get sales moving again.
My thought is this: if I feel I cannot afford a $500,000 home in the changing rate environments of today (long term rates started going up last week as Fed chief Ben Bernake is now signalling that bailing out Real Estate interests is not America's main interest, but controlling inflation by propping up the dollar is) I will surely not care if Florida Real Estate taxes go down tomorrow.
The main problem with Real Estate is it is too overpriced.
The average man and woman in Florida has not seen their wages and salary keep up with the exploding price of Real Estate. So something has to give.
Either Florida wages and salaries will have to double overnight so we can all afford to begin looking at what is overpriced housing today, or the people who really want to sell their homes will have to lower prices to a realistic point where possible buyers might begin to look.
Jack McCabe, housing analyst, recently gave his thoughts about this magic bullet of lower taxes which the Real Estate Cartel hopes will kill the Housing Crash beast:

Analyst Jack McCabe, who is advising large vulture investors on bulk deals, said big investment groups aren't as worried about tax rates as individuals -- saying such costs can be spread out across big buyers' portfolios.

Last week McCabe announced the completion of the first market-corrected deal he's worked on since the slowdown began. While short on specifics, McCabe said a multibillion-dollar private investment fund bought a substantial block of newly built condominiums from a publicly-held home builder in Florida. His investor client, he said, was chosen because of its ``ability to close quickly in an all-cash transaction, noncontingent on financing.''

Currently, he said the market is too sick to recover from a tax reduction alone. A big property tax cut may reignite buying now, he said, but would effectively create a false bottom.

''Meaningful reduction will slow down the correction cycle but the correction is still inevitable,'' said the Deerfield Beach analyst, who has warned for some time about too much construction going up too fast. ''The market is so sick it will take a while to cure this,'' he said. ``This is not a head cold, it is more like pneumonia.''

But such doomsayers also believe the market is poised for brighter days ahead. McCabe says that barring calamitous hurricanes, the market will have righted itself by 2010 -- just as the first baby boomers turn 65.

''No one is more bullish on Florida long-term than me,'' McCabe said.

It's such thinking that prompted corporate raider Carl Icahn to announce last week that he would continue efforts to buy Bonita Springs-based WCI Communities....

All I will add to McCabe's views is this: it all comes down to Economics 101, the Law of Supply and Demand. When there is too much demand, prices go up. When there is too much supply . . . as we see today all over America with housing . . . prices have to come down.
There is no other way to get Real Estate sales moving again other than for homeowners to "get real" with their pricing today. The longer the sellers continue to drip, drip, drip in their price drops, the longer their pain of waiting for a buyer to come along.
I believe many sellers will soon be caught with their pants down and their skirts up as the Federal Reserve focuses on keeping inflation in check by not lowering rates. And if the Fed Chief raises rates just 50 basis points (one-half of one percent), we will see just how many homeowners were standing naked when the small tide of buyers are sucked out to sea.
Mark my words: one healthy rate increase will end all illusions that Real Estate is a smart "investment". It will also suck money out of our stock markets. But if Bernanke has to decide between keeping bubbles alive or propping up the US Dollar and killing inflation, my bet is he'll raise rates. (And just two months ago, I was one who felt like he'd try and save housing by lowering rates.)
If this prediction turns true, more people will be knocked out of the dream of buying a home at today's prices as lenders will further tighten their rules for borrowers.
Fewer qualified borrowers will mean more inventory building on the market.
As McCabe said about Real Estate's growing inventory and declining sales, "This is not a head cold, this is more like pnemonia. Unlike McCabe, I don't see any bottoming in Real Estate by 2010.
I believe we will see further pain and dropping prices in 2010.
This might take 15 years or more to correct.
My advice to sellers: figure out where you want to be in 5 to 15 years. If you want to move today, drop your price. If you have to take a hit in capital gains or perhaps take a loss on a sale, ask yourself what is more important: getting on with your life with a shred of sanity, or having to do a daily gut check wondering if you can induce someone to look over your overpriced home?
If you want to get on with life, drop your prices.
If you want more of the same indecisiveness which will drive you into a funk, keep sitting on your house you no longer want to live in and continue to refuse to drop your price.
It's that simple.

04 June 2007

Revisiting and Updating Our Shanghai Exchange Charts from 10 days ago . . . Shanghai Market has lost 15% in the Past 4 Days

Compare the Shanghai Daily Exchange Charts from 25 May 07 to Today's 4 June 07 Chart

On May 25, I pointed out and asked "The Chinese market closes at 4151.13. In the last 17 years, you can see this market has gone up 4200% . . . is this sustainable for much longer?"

And the answer is an emphatic NO!

Last week, after the Chinese government tripled taxes on trading fees, the Shanghai market saw the bears take over from the bulls.

And today, 4 June 07, the market declined 8.26%.

Overall, in the past four trading sessions, the Shanghai market has lost 15% of its value. You are not seeing things. That's right, 15% of the whole market has vaporized.

Click on the charts. Read the details. See for yourself.

As I asked on one chart, "How low will she go?"

Print out the charts. Clip them into a notebook for future generations to observe and learn what bubble markets look like.


Okay, the above was the chart from 6 trading sessions ago. After today's swan dive off a cliff, here is what the same chart looks like now . . .


And here is the update on the monthly chart. Please read notes on this chart as it explains what the monthly is beginning to portend for July . . .

One more big question: should the Shanghai Market lose 50% or more from its market top, how will that affect world markets? Will we shrug off the losses in China as we have done in the past 4 trading sessions?

Machts nichts, i.e., "It doesn't matter?"

Stay tuned to this board for timely updates . . .

Rock's Stocks: First Official Pick for the Rock Trueblood Watchworld Blog: Johnson and Johnson (NYSE: JNJ)


Strong Buy: Johnson and Johnson (NYSE: JNJ)
Buy Range: $62 to $68 a share.
I am selecting Johnson and Johnson as our very first pick for this blog.
Friday, 1 June 07, Johnson and Johnson shares closed at $63.41 a share.
In a Nutshell, Here are 22 Reasons Why I Recommend You Buy Johnson and Johnson Shares NOW in the $62 to $68 range:
  1. The longterm Japanese Candlestick chart of mine shows JNJ shares "reconfirming" a longterm trendline three times in 2007. My charting service, stockcharts.com, only has data going back to 1990. Still the trendline shown (snapped from a start in 1994) is a continuation of a much older trendline starting in 1984 which I snapped on a JNJ Japanese candlestick chart using another charting service. This other charting service allows no "snapshots" of their charts to be cut, pasted or saved to my hardrive. If I could show you the older chart's trendline (23 year old trendline vs. this 13 year old trendline on the chart shown above) you would see the same identical rate of rise of the trendline.
  2. Extending my trendline to Jan. 1, 2010, I am looking for JNJ shares to be trading with a base range of $95 to $105 a share. This is approximately a 33% increase over the next 2 1/2 years. Figure in dividend reinvesting, and I am looking for no less than a 40% total return increase in share worth during the next 2 1/2 years.
  3. Johnson and Johnson has increased dividends every year for the past 40 years straight. The current dividend is .415 cents per quarter. This dividend was just raised 10.7%, or from .375 cents a share to its current .415 cents a share. (Note: Yahoo data does not go back to 1966 . . . the year JNJ started dividend payments with yearly raises.)
  4. Johnson and Johnson is formally positioned in one of the Top 3 performing sectors of all time according to Dr. Jeremy Siegel author of "The Future for Investors": healthcare.
  5. The Healthcare sector shall grow dynamically during the next 50 years as America and most of the Western World's population ages more quickly than new babies are born. At this time 76 million Baby Boomers in the USA are just beginning to retire. Also, immigration laws are being designed to add new immigrants to our overall population, increasing a pool of new social security/medicare payers who will also need healthcare and who will help pay for healthcare of retiring Americans with no health plans. Healthcare needs will explode, benefitting Johnson and Johnson in an exponential way during the next 50 years.
  6. Johnson and Johnson not only has consumer staples (Splenda, Neutrogena, Bandaids, Tylenol, cotton ear swabs, contact lenses,etc.) but many medical devices and prescription drugs.
  7. Johnson and Johnson bought out Pfizer's Consumer Healthcare Brands this past January. The products they've added to their pipeline of Consumer goods with the Pfizer purchase are names we all know: Neosporin, Listerine, and others. These new consumer products are just beginning to generate topline growth and will also filter quickly to the bottom line.
  8. Johnson and Johnson recently bought out China's biggest skincare/cosmetics maker, Dabao. This gives JNJ a foothold in over 3000 outlets, many of them second tier Chinese cities and towns where Dabao products are featured. . Dabao products are low to medium priced which will fit nicely with the more expensive Neutrogena products already sold by JNJ
  9. Brand name is one of the Top 50 in the world.
  10. It is one of the Top Ten Fortune 500 Companies.
  11. Forbes Magazine made JNJ one of their Top 5 stocks to buy in 2007.
  12. Warren Buffet, one of the greatest investors of all time, has recently upped Berkshire Hathaway's stake in JNJ to 48,665,600 shares. This is almost a doubling of the shares he already owned.
  13. Earnings on this giant have increased up a beautiful long straight trendline (for the most part) for over 40 years.
  14. People are afraid what will happen to healthcare stocks if Democrats take back control of the White House. However, “From 1948 to February 2006 the stock market has returned 11.95%. Under Republican control the stock market returned 9.53% and under Democratic control the stock market returned 15.26%” - Dr. Jeremy Siegel
  15. JNJ is well diversified and has more sales outside the US than anytime in its history. Regardless of what happens with healthcare in the USA, the broad product lines, and the surging Global Economy, will help take up any slack caused by US government controls placed in any healthcare bills in the next decade or so. JNJ is what I call a "global goliath".
  16. So great is JNJ, it is one of 30 stocks in the Dow Industrials. Liquidity is never a problem. This is a stronghold for many institutional buyers.
  17. The recent most quarterly report shows diluted earnings of $1.17 per share . . . or a 17% gain over same quarter in 2006 with .99 cents earnings. Several acquisitions will dampen earnings in the about to be reported quarter, giving investors a better chance at buying than our official buy in price.
  18. Recent weakness in JNJ's share price is probably attributable to negative investors sentiment over recent patent challenges. More notably, Cypher stent sales concerns about risk of blood clots from drug-eluting stents and new competition in stents . . . particularly after Boston Scientific bought out Guidant for a price higher than JNJ was willing to pay. The recent acquisition of Conor Medsystems gives JNJ a next-generation stent that should address many of these concerns. For a net $1.3 billion cash, taking an $807 million charge to 1Q07 earnings for IPR&D. . . There was a snag, however, with Conor's new CoStar stent. JNJ has discontinued sales of it abroad and has quietly stopped its pre-approval use application to the FDA. This will shave a few pennies off the bottom line for the year. Hopefully, this gives investors a little more time to average in their buys of JNJ this year.
  19. On 23 May 06, Cordis Corp., the heart device unit of Johnson & Johnson Inc., said it agreed to become the worldwide distributor of a line of bare metal stents made by Israeli medical device maker Medinol.
  20. Megatrend: Globabl pharma sales rose 7% last year. JNJ will benefit from their global exposure.
  21. Value Line rates JNJ as a 1 for "safety", meaning this is a stock which will hold up well in an major market downturn.
  22. Motley Fool's "The BMW Method" board is calling a buy on JNJ (using Mike Klein's charts posted on the highlighted website) based on their method of tracking Compound Annual Growth patterns on logarithmic charts invented by founder Jim "BuildMWell". This is a great mechanical screening tool which I added to my toolbox for Blue Chip Big Cap companies only two years ago. It is eerie how many times one of my longterm charts and one of the BMW method charts scream "Strong Buy" at the same time. My Japanese Candlestick charts led me to BUD, PFE, KO and many others in which the BMW charts were also crying out "STRONG BUY".

Okay, gang, that's 22 Reasons to Buy Johnson and Johnson now.

I hope we have a few more months of sideways or down action in shareprice so that we can all build sizeable holdings in our ports. Once it hits $68, I will throttle back on my purchases as I believe JNJ will then be "off to the races".

Think about the 3 billion new Capitalists unleashed overseas who are buying Johnson and Johnson healthcare products right now. Although individual Chinese investors cannot yet buy American companies, that day is fast approaching. And Johnson and Johnson owns many categories of consumer staples and healthcare products in China (and India) already, so the name will be one of the first to be bought.

One more bonus point to drive home: JNJ is not only a healthcare company . . . it is also a consumer staples company.

And I will remind you again from my blog about Dr. Jeremy Siegel's book showing how stocks outperformed real estate . . . the top 3 performing sectors with dividends reinvested over the past 50 years are:

  1. Energy
  2. Consumer Staples
  3. Healthcare

Hence, in JNJ, we have a very "safe" play which is focused in 2 of the top 3 sectors for share growth when dividends are reinvested every quarter.

As Mr. T sez, "I pity da fool who don't buy Johnson and Johnson here and now and hold that sucka forever."

25 May 2007

A Couple of Charts for Motley Fool's "Macro Economic Trends and Risks" Board



Two Must See Charts of the Irrationally Exuberant Chinese Stock Market
To my regular readers on this board:
I have the next two days off. I intend to take some quality time to think about some news about the Chinese markets which is being discussed on the outstanding Motley Fool message board named "Macro Economic Trends and Risks".
I am not going to write a post about China at this moment as I am now digesting some stuff which I have only recently become aware of about the Chinese banking system and their stock market.
However, the discussion on the "Macro Economic Trends and Risks" board is too good to not have some clear pictures added to the discussion about the insanity of the Shanghai exchange.
A note to all about these charts:
These charts are static Photographs of charts at the end of business for 25 May 07. They will not update. So, as a courtesy to all my readers, I will update these charts weekly now, shooting for a Friday morning look every week here in the USA. If the Shanghai market crashes, I will of course give updated photos of the market daily on this blog.
To see either chart in an easy to read size, simply click on them.
The reason for showing the charts here on this blog instead of trying to post them to the Motley Fool board directly is I have had too many people from Fool write me emails telling me my trendlines move around, or my Fibonacci lines are not showing, or my comments printed on the chart are truncated or missing. By posting charts here, I know that what I see on my end is what you should see on your end with no more distortions of trendlines, mussed up comments, missing averages, etc. By the way, I did not use a moving average on my monthly chart as I don't normally use them at all on my longterm charts.
The first chart above shows the Shanghai Exchange's trendline and monthly candlesticks from 1990 to the present. I have no idea when that exchange began its existence. I do know that stockcharts.com only gives data for many stocks and indices going back only as far as 1990. So, this exchange may have gone up more than 4200% in its existence. (Perhaps someone on Fool can research the beginning of the Shanghai exchange?)
Secondly, this monthly chart is followed by a daily chart.
The daily chart is one where I have added a 200 day moving average. (The red line). I have also added a 50 day moving average. (The blue line).
I did this because I read something in a great piece by Ty Anrdos on freebuck.com which made the following point which I will not comment on here. I only offer this as a giant red flag flapping in a hurricane wind that is picking up, and I will offer my own opinions and thoughts later . . . and maybe it would be better if all of you reading this would scoot over to the Motley Fool "Macro Economic Trends and Risk" board to lurk because I believe this is going to be as lively a discussion as there has been in quite some time . . . That said, here's the bit from Ty Andros great commenatary which pertains to this daily chart and its 200 day moving average:

“But we should point out that the Shanghai market is currently approximately 95% above its 200 day moving average. To put that in perspective, in the history of the Dow Jones Industrial Average, including wild speculative binges such as 1929, we are unable to find a market high that was more than approximately 55% above its 200 day moving average.

Perhaps the amazing upward explosion in the Nasdaq leading to the March 2000 peak comes to mind as a similar market bubble to be compared with Shanghai. That market also stopped its runaway phase right around the 55% mark above its 200 day moving average.

In our experience, these types of bubbly blow off market phases are more conducive to subsequent crashes than they are to subsequent economic booms. It is difficult to conceive that a market almost 100% above its 200 day moving average will end up in any way but a negative fashion. Only time will tell.”

23 May 2007

Roger Shiller's Advice: "Stay Away from the Pack"


Money Magazine's Jason Zweig Interviews Robert Shiller
Readers of this blog know that I hold Robert Shiller in high esteem. He is, after all, the man who warned us all that the Internet stock mania would end badly. In fact, his book which clearly outlined this warning, "Irrational Exuberance", became the most famous two words uttered by ex-Fed chief, Alan Greespan, when he warned Congress the markets were valued way beyond sanity.
In an earlier blog of mine "How Stocks Have Done Since the Millenium: Why Buying My Rental House is a Losing Bet Today", I quoted from an early article by Shiller published on the Internet in 2005 which warned that Housing would crash as surely as the Nasdaq crashed in 2000.
I quoted from Shiller's article the last two paragraphs verbatim:

"Well, we are looking upon a real estate boom again, and we are likely to observe the same end to speculative feeling, at least before many years have passed. Human nature is unchanged. In a bubble, high prices are sustained only by the expectation of more high prices. That is what makes a bubble a bubble, prone to bursting.

The reason we cannot expect a soft landing today is that right now people are willing to pay these very high prices only because they expect them to go up even more in the future. Prices can't just level off, because when people no longer expect them to go up, some of them will not want to hold at the high price."


Yesterday, a new interview with Shiller appeared on the Internet titled "Robert Shiller: Mr. Worst-case scenario." The interview was conducted by Money Magazine's Jason Zweig, placed on Yahoo Finance, and I've cut just the interview from the piece for your reading pleasure:

Question: What caused the stock bubble, and why did it end as it did?

Answer: Some sociologists talk about collective consciousness. We humans evolved to be very closely linked, and our minds focus on the same ideas. Those [ideas] get reinforced because we hear them all the time.


Back in the late 1990s, you kept hearing that you had to stake your claim on the Internet or you'd miss out on the future. No one cared about the present.

Then something happened around March 2000. There was an acceleration of public talk about doubts. You could no longer declare at a cocktail party that Internet stocks were going up. Such statements had become embarrassing -and just like that, word of mouth changed. Embarrassment is a powerful emotion.


Question: Is that about to happen in real estate?

Answer: It doesn't seem like we're there quite yet. But this is the biggest boom in housing prices since, well, ever.

Nothing seems to explain it, and nobody forecast it. It seems to me...wait a minute. Please don't quote me as forecasting the markets.

Question: Okay. What you're about to say is not a forecast.

Answer: Well, human thinking is built around stories, and the story that has sustained the housing boom is that homes are like stocks. Buy one anywhere and it'll go up. It's the easiest way to get rich.


Question: So how rich can you get on real estate?

Answer: From 1890 through 1990, the return on residential real estate was just about zero after inflation.


Question: Excuse me? That's all? Hasn't it been higher lately?

Answer: Since 1987 it's been 6 percent [or about 3 percent a year after inflation].

Question: So real estate doesn't go up roughly 10 percent a year?

Answer: It can't be true that homes rise 10 percent a year. If they did, in the long run no one would be able to afford a house.


Question: Let me grab a calculator. If real estate really rose 10 percent a year, a $25,000 home in 1957 should be worth roughly $3 million now.

Answer: And that flies in the face of common sense. In fact, I'm inclined to think there's a good chance that the return on real estate will be negative, substantially negative, over the next 10 years because all booms reverse in the end.


Question: All right. We won't call that a forecast either. So how should people think about their home as an asset?

Answer: Avoid concentration of risks. You need a house, but I would avoid a second one - or at least avoid an outsize house. Over-investing in real estate now would be a recipe for disaster.

Question: You also write about the risk to human
capital. What's that?

Answer: What you're trying to do is to invest in skills that somebody else will want to pay you for. Let's say you want to work at Bethlehem Steel.

That would have been a good idea in the 1950s, not so good by the 1970s. The world went the wrong way on you.

Question: How can you manage that risk?

Answer: I used to coach children's soccer, and I would tell my players, "Stand away from the pack, and sooner or later the ball will come to you."

In your career choices too: Get away from the pack. Also, you associate your home country with safety. But the rest of the world is pretty peaceful too, on average, and the average is all that matters.

I think relatively few [Americans] are getting away from the pack, investing more outside the U.S. than in.

Question: How are you investing now?

Answer: I'm probably a little over 60 percent in stocks, almost all of it outside the U.S. I have a lot of cash. And I've been reducing my exposure to real estate. It may be at the end of a cycle.

Since the late 1990s, Blue Chip Big Caps have been ignored by investors. Big Caps have sorely underperformed Emerging Markets, small caps, Real Estate, and so on.
However, I firmly believe this is the time to be loading up on familiar Big Cap names with Global exposure. I especially urge anyone buying stock to focus on the following three top performing sectors since the beginning of the S&P 500 in 1957:
  1. Energy
  2. Personal Staples
  3. Healthcare

I have two energy stocks I will be discussing on this board in the near future which I would urge anyone to buy, sock away in a Roth IRA or other retirement account, and re-invest the dividends forever until you are ready to retire.

I have two personal staples stocks I would recommend here and now.

I have two healthcare stocks I will recommend to anyone in the near future.

And I have one mid-cap stock which is a play off all three sectors and other stocks which have sustained growth while paying dividends.

I will be publishing my first official stocks picks soon on this board. And these picks will be looked at monthly on a Watchworld scorecard.

That said, Shiller is urging us to invest overseas. What Shiller did not bring out is this: you can buy multi-national companies which have large presences overseas.

In fact, four of the seven stocks above which I will soon recommend make more money overseas than they do in the USA . . . and I think when I mention some of these names . . . you will be stunned to learn that these "American" companies have larger exposure off-shore and are making big profits by currency exchanges added into the mix.

For now, however, go back and read what Shiller is telling anyone who is thinking about buying Real Estate in these exuberant times.

He believes:

  • You know the Real Estate Bubble is finally dead when people are too embarrassed to talk about it openly as a way to make money. (You know we haven't reached that point in Key West as the local NAR branch is still running ads "Now Is a Great Time to Buy a Home!")
  • From 1890 - 1990, the return on Real Estate was zero after inflation was factored in.
  • From 1987 through 2007, Real Estate has only gone up roughly 6% annually. In reality, the reutrn is only 3% annually after inflation is figured in.
  • Real estate could not possibly go up 10% a year as some NAR wags claim as that would make a house which cost $25,000 in 1957 worth $3 million today. (The house my parents bought for $7,000 in 1950 would not be worth $60,000 today in Richmond, VA . . . which means it doubled in price only three times in 57 years for only a 3.84% compounded annual growth rate . . . and this includes the last five to seven years of the Housing Bubble)
  • Avoid concentrations of risk. Go where others are not already crowded.

p.s. Disclosure: I am very heavily weighted in gold, silver and oil in my real life portfolios. In fact, I own real gold and silver proof coins.

Anyone who does not own gold, silver and oil in their portfolios at this time in history is simply playing Russian Zip with an Uzi machine gun loaded with a full clip, IMO.

If you can't make yourself buy real gold and silver as a hedge, please, understand where oil is today with prices already skirting $4.00 a gallon in the Florida Keys.

Read the Mogambo Guru's weekly column you see headlined on the margin of this blog. His humorous writing is a compendium of knowledge he has gleaned from other writers during the past week. Mogambo is crazy as a fox. Read and learn.

You will also want to see a Matt Simmons slideshow about oil. Just google his name. Look for a slideshow. All you need to know about oil is right there in 50 or 60 slides that Matt has put together to wake you up.

Look about you. Start thinking about the obvious. See all those For Sale signs in your town? Who can afford to buy those homes now that the EZ Credit train has jumped the track leaving millions of bagholders on the platform scratching their asses wondering who is going to take them away from all the masses scratching their asses?

Keep reading this blog to learn that Real Estate has gone colder than Walt Disney's head.

Meanwhile, use your head.

Gold, silver, oil. Get those hedges first if you are just starting out. Then we can add in the healthcare and personal staple stocks later. As Mogambo would say, you can thank me later.

22 May 2007

Ohio: "A tsunami of Foreclosures is on the way!"



So Many Mortgage Related Problems in Ohio, Legal Aid Can't Handle Them All . . . What's More, It's Going to Become a Lot Worse . . .

Every once in a while, you read a short news item on the web which doesn't make the front page of say the New York Times, Raw Story, the Drudge Report, USA Today, etc., yet the story contains something which tugs at your heartstrings.

I read such a story just moments ago.

Ohio’s Foreclosure Prevention Task Force held its fourth meeting today in what was billed as an opportunity for borrowers facing foreclosure or people who’ve been through the foreclosure process to tell their stories.
Instead, almost all of the 21 speakers who signed up were officials from agencies that represent borrowers or businesses involved in mortgage lending – and all had an opinion on how to stem foreclosures in Ohio, which rose 24 percent in 2006.
Mark Lawson, a senior attorney for the Legal Aid Society of Southwest Ohio, told the panel that his organization has so many people calling for help with mortgage-related problems that it can’t begin to handle them all.
“This is an epidemic. You think it’s bad now? You have a tsunami of foreclosures on its way,” said Tom Conley, a self-described foreclosure intervention specialist from Columbus who said he went through a foreclosure a year ago.
Investor seminars are being offered around the country teaching people how to profit from people saddled with overvalued houses and mortgages they can’t afford, Conley warned.
Gov. Ted Strickland set up the task force this spring to foster foreclosure prevention, as well as intervention and strategies to assist distressed mortgage holders. The task force includes representatives from local governments, lenders, non-profit sector and private sector..

Inside this story is vignette about a scumbag Realtor who also wears the hats of mortgage broker and construction contractor. This man took advantage of an ignorant working woman. Here's the few paragraphs detailing how this poor woman was deceived by a black hearted businessman who is probably still out there making more deals of this type.

(I know a similar Realtor/Mortgage Broker in Key West with the same sociopathic tendencies. I pass this along as a public service. The more stories like this you read, the lower your chances you will be taken advantage of in the future when you decide to finally buy Real Estate.)

As I've said before on this blog: don't put your trust in strangers who only look at you as a big hefty commission:

Lawson cited one example of an unidentified woman who bought a two-family house in 2005 with an adjustable-rate mortgage that started with an interest rate of 9.5 percent.

The property was appraised at $130,000, although an earlier appraisal put its value at only about $70,000.

She bought it on the recommendation of a real estate agent who, Lawson later discovered, was an owner of the company that arranged the mortgage.

The loan included $15,000 for repairs necessary to make the second unit rentable, which the real estate agent contracted to perform himself, Lawson said. The repairs were never completed, and the woman will probably have to give up the property, he said.


Stat Counter from 10 Nov 08